Samuel Groth vs Jan Vacek Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L W L L L
Form
L L W W W W L W L LHead To Head: Groth 1 - 0 Vacek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Groth winning 2 and Vacek winning 0. The last match between Groth and Vacek was at the The LTA Manchester Trophy - Manchester, 15-07-2008, First, Grass with Samuel Groth getting the victory 7-6(6) 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Samuel Groth | 1 |
| Jan Vacek | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Samuel Groth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
46%
(
12 of
26)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Groth
Player
Manuel Sanchez
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
13
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Samuel Groth
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
8
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
11%
(
6 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Samuel Groth
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jan Vacek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 3-6 9-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Vacek
Player
Scott Lipsky
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Vacek
Player
Martin Fischer
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jan Vacek
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
25 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luis Horna
Player
Jan Vacek
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
78%
(
42 of
54)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (387/296) | Win/Loss | 53% (250/221) |
| 55% (887/740) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (585/538) |
| 51% (8565/8074) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5473/5256) |
| 0.62 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 5047 | Aces Total | 94 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 1693 | Total Double Faults | 56 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 589.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 499.16 |
| 60% (15812/26450) | 1st Serve % | 61% (858/1410) |
| 79% (12561/15812) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (603/858) |
| 51% (5404/10636) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (280/549) |
| 35% (579/1669) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (56/139) |
| 32% (8500/26231) | Return Points Win % | 38% (541/1434) |
| 58% (371/643) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (241/450) |
| 42% (11/26) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 53% (225/423) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (78/154) |
| 56% (136/243) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (79/157) |
| 83% (373/310) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (237/207) |
| 17% (373/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (237/30) |
| 24% (307/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (234/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
